[Don't] Just Shoot Me

Interpretations over the Second Amendment "right to bear arms" has been argued since the words hit the page. We have been taught that guns kill but that also, guns protect. In a world of nuclear arms races, the media and world police show that the bigger and more powerful weapon wins, and those without weaponry loose. But I digress. The issue here is not the presence of guns, for the constitution grants us the right to "bear arms." The issue is how can the government protects the innocent from those with malicious intent from guns, without taking this right from everyone.

The issue with gun control is an issue of regulations and background checks. Republicans feel that heavy regulations and background checks are invasive, imposing on freedom of private property and personal information. They feel that, due to the constitutional backing and emphasis on freedom, every individual has the right to own a gun. Obviously there are special exceptions, Republicans are not advocating for giving guns to the criminally insane; firearms are an inalienable right for Americans and it should be easy for law-abiding citizens to exercise that right if they so choose.

Democrats are more concerned with the equality aspect of democracy (a theme that will constantly reiterate itself). While Democrats recognize the point of liberty, that the Constitution outlines the right to bear arms, the Constitution was mainly created to protect the people-a sometimes difficult feat in the presence of an armed society. Democrats feel that strict regulations on gun purchase and ownership must be enacted in order to protect all citizens. If it were more difficult for those with malicious intentions to purchase guns, then those seeking protection may either a) have the upper-hand in terms of defense or b) not even need to purchase a gun. There are also loopholes regarding gun shows in which limited or no background check is required; Democrats feel that the gun show loop hole must be closed, again, so that all people can be safe from gun violence.

Gun Control is a touchy subject because citizens and victims of gun violence have drastically differing views; there is no right or wrong view, just different. Some wish there were looser regulations, so that they could easier purchase a gun in the name of self-defense. Others agree with stricter regulations, hoping to make it difficult for firearms to get into the wrong hands. Unfortunately, we live in a society of terrorism and school shootings, so the average citizen does not formulate an opinion until a crisis evokes a response. It is important, not only to have an opinion on all major issues to stay politically engaged, but also to better prepare for a situation. If you form a opinion regarding gun regulation and safety, America can better work towards prevention, rather than crisis response.

Stay informed and keep talking.